[Book review] Notes on the Death of Culture: Essays on Spectacle and Society, by Mario Vargas Llosa

[Book review] Notes on the Death of Culture: Essays on Spectacle and Society, by Mario Vargas Llosa

After reading The Bad Girl by Mario Vargas Llosa I became an instant fan of the guy. Of his style of writing, of his stories, of his creativity. Notes on the Death of Culture: Essays on Spectacle and Society (La civilización del espectáculo) was no different. This book really spoke to me because it is a critic of today’s society and how our lives have become some sort of show which is not supposed to last very long or be remembered. 

“What do I mean by civilization of the spectacle? That of a world in which entertainment occupies first place on the chart of current values, where having a good time, escaping boredom, is a universal passion. this life ideal is perfectly legitimate, of course. Only a puritan fanatic could reproach the members of a society who want to provide entertainment, recreation, humor and diversion to lives generally framed by depressing and at times numbing routines. But to convert that natural penchant for having a good time into a supreme value sometimes had unexpected consequences. These include the banalization of culture, the spread of superficiality, and, in the specific field of information, the proliferation of irresponsible journalism, which feeds off gossip and scandal.”

One of the subjects he extends himself in, and I enjoyed very much, is culture. He mentions how in the past there used to be high and low culture. The first belonged to the upper class and the latter to the lower one (I don’t even think the middle class really existed until the Industrial Age). That distinction provided the environment for the creation of great art, music, plays, etc.

This is such a controversial topic, because as much as it is important to universalize knowledge and culture there is a paradigm switch, from culture back then being something transcendent and meaningful to now being almost purely for entertainment, extremely commercial and very temporary.

“The essential difference between the culture of the past and the entertainment of today is that the products of the former sought to transcend mere present time, to endure, to stay alive for future generations, while the products of the latter are made to be consumed instantly and disappear, like cake or popcorn.”

I also found very interesting his take on the part intellectuals play in our society today.

“Because in the civilization of the spectacle, intellectuals are of interest only if they play the fashion game and become clowns.”

I agree with him on this one. In the past, we had leaders in our communities such as Gandhi or and Mandela who truly change their era because of their points of view and their attitude. Today, so much of the will to change the world get lost in our noisy way of living. Of course, we do still have such leaders, but their scale is not as broad as in the past.

Besides culture, he goes about how the spectacle spirit “poisoned” everything, from art to politics, from religion to economy, and even our sex and love lives. His writing can bring a lot of that “back in those days things were better” sentiment. Nonetheless, his arguments are solid and are reasonable.

One critique that can be made about this book and which is also valid it’s that though he presents the horrible state of our society today, he lacks in suggesting a solution. For me, after reading the book I don’t imagine how he could have come up with a list of solutions for so many deep and structural “problems”. Besides, that would mean writing a whole new book with completely different purposes than this one.

Anyway, I highly recommend this book for people who likes to discuss the topics of culture, society, art, culture, philosophy, political and economical systems… I don’t think is a read for everyone. So, if you can try a sample first, on kindle or elsewhere.

If you want, here are my affiliate links to these books in English and in Portuguese. ✨🤩

Happy reading!

Your friend,

Ana.

[Book review] The Bad Girl

[Book review] The Bad Girl

The Bad Girl (Travesura de la niña mala), by Mario Vargas Llosa, was a welcoming surprise in my readings this year. I remember having a professor in university recommending this book and his enthusiasm planted the title and the author in my mind.

This is the unconventional love story of Ricardo Somocurcio, a Peruvian translator whose only dream is to live in Paris, and Lily, his femme fatale love interest who comes in and out of his life as she pleases; each time with a new name, a new husband and a new location attached.

They meet in high school and Lily catches Somocurcio’s attention by being wilder and wittier than the other girls in his group of friends. Soon, he learns she is not who she said to be, but it does not matter anymore as he is already enamored with the girl.

The teenage romance carries on throughout their lives and while he becomes the purest source of love for her, she turns into is his fount of adventures and the only appearing moving force of his ordinary life.

The repetitiveness of the departures and arrivals is easily forgotten as the author always seems to find new ways to create conflicts and resolutions.

Another interesting component of this novel is the historical one. It travels through at least 30 years of social and political transformations, such as the Cuban revolution and the hippie movement.

As the end approached, I could not help, but wonder if the author was going to ruin his composition. Gladly, that was not the case. In fact, it was what made this book an unforgettable one for me.

Winner of the Nobel Prize Literature in 2010, Vargas Llosa narrates this captivating semi-autobiographical piece in a well-sewed way. He was simple and smart with his words and each page made me want to read the next one. And as I closed the book, I felt that famous joy of having read a beautiful story.

What about you? Do you have any books that made you feel this way? Let me know.

Your friend,

Ana.

[Book Review] Breakfast At Tiffany’s

[Book Review] Breakfast At Tiffany’s

There is something about someone saying good things about someone else that makes me immediately appreciate the someone else in question. That is how I knew I would like Holly Golightly and Truman Capote’s most acclaimed novella, Breakfast At Tiffany’s.

Through the eyes of the unknown young writer and narrator, we can see how a nineteen-year-old girl with a captivating personality, was able to make acquaintances with people from different paths such as the bar owner Joe Bell, the Italian mafioso Sally Tomato and even the millionaire Rusty Trawler and find in all of them a source of admiration.

The story of Holly or Lulamae does not build up very steeply, probably because it was not written in the first person, but mainly because the events are not the focus, but herself and her ideas. No matter how simple she looked, she was real. To me, that is one of the most interesting aspects of a person, their authenticity.

She, like most youngsters, is trying to find her identity but is doing so in a genuine manner, looking for beauty along the way and following her instincts. It is only so often you see her mentioning how she is trying to find what is truly hers, her cat, her street, her apartment, her place in the world.

One of my favorite quotes from the book is when she refuses an opportunity to work in a film that could have made her a star. She’s talking to her wannabe agent, O. J. Berman, from New York:

 “‘She says, this is Holly, I say, honey, you sound far away, she says I’m in New York, I say what the hell are you doing in New York when it’s Sunday and you got the test tomorrow? She says I’m in New York cause I’ve never been to New York. I say get your ass on a plane and get back here, she says I don’t want it. I say what’s your angle, doll? She says you got to want it to be good and I don’t want it, I say well, what the hell do you want, and she says when I find out you’ll be the first to know.’”

Holly is proof that being open to the universe, to the hardships, to the criticism, to adventure and to love is inspirational and it pays off.

I found this to be an easy, quick, and pleasant read and Capote got it right to have this piece written with such a simple, light, and charming aura, that is so Holly Golightly.

Have you ever read it? What did you think?

Your friend,

Ana Zarb

[Book Review] Man’s Search for Meaning – Part II

[Book Review] Man’s Search for Meaning – Part II

In the last part of this review I talked about the first section of Frankl’s book, A Man’s Search for Meaning, in which he describes the mechanisms used by the imprisoned men in the concentration camps to try to survive and overcome that situation. It is a pretty powerful story I think must be read in full.

In this post, I would like to take up on the second part of the book where he describes with some more detail how does the logotherapy works, using examples of his real-life patients to explicit some of the concepts.

I will focus on 3 main concepts which contextualize the primary field of work of logotherapy and that really gave me so many insights about life and society in general: the Noö-dynamics, the Noögenic neuroses and the existential vacuum.

art-ballerina-ballet-1231258

Logotherapy tries to take a look into the future and find meanings to be fulfilled as this is man’s primary motivation in life, according to Frankl. Theses meanings are different for each person and therefore can only be fulfilled by him or her.

The process of finding meaning is not simple and does not come as natural for some people and can cause, what the author calls, an existential frustration. Basically, it is a type of existential anguish where the individual is frustrated due to the confusion in the seeking/discovering of the meaning of his/her life.

“Existential frustration is in itself neither pathological nor pathogenic. A man’s concern, even his despair, over the worthwhileness of life is an existential distress but by no means a mental disease.”

In fact, having some amount of conflict and frustration is not only normal but also healthy. This state is what Frankl describes as the Noö-dynamics, where the individual fluctuates between two sides of a spectrum: whether being in extreme existential conflict and having no conflict at all.

“I consider it a dangerous misconception of mental hygiene to assume that what man needs in the first place is equilibrium or, as it is called in biology, “homeostasis,” i.e., a tensionless state. What man actually needs is not a tensionless state but rather the striving and struggling for a worthwhile goal, a freely chosen task. […] What he needs is not the discharge of tension at any cost but the call of a potential meaning waiting to be fulfilled by him.”

The existential frustration can, however, in some cases, turn into a neurotic situation, more specifically a Noögenic kind of neurosis.

“In contrast to neuroses in the traditional sense of the word, i.e., psychogenic neuroses, Noögenic neuroses have their origin not in the psychological but rather in the “noölogical” (from the Greek noös meaning mind) dimension of human existence. […] Noögenic neuroses do not emerge from conflicts between drives and instincts but rather from existential problems. Among such problems, the frustration of the will to meaning plays a large role.”

Other than some kind of neurosis, Frankl argues that those who do not have a meaning to fulfill may find themselves in an existential vacuum, which reveal itself in a state of boredom.

“That feeling of which so many patients complain today, namely, the feeling of the total and ultimate meaninglessness of their lives. They lack the awareness of a meaning worth living for. They are haunted by the experience of their inner emptiness, a void within themselves.”

According to him, this feeling of existential vacuum is worsening due to the progression of automation. It basically means that technology advance increased its participation and importance in our lives but in order to do that it had to replace humans who used to perform their activity in the first place.

The humans were then offered more time. However, if they don’t know what to do with this “free-time”, they can find themselves feeling a little empty which can then turn into a more dangerous scenario.

“The pity of it is that many of these [average workers] will not know what to do with all their newly acquired free time. […] Not a few cases of suicide can be traced back to this existential vacuum. Such widespread phenomena as depression, aggression and addiction are not understandable unless we recognize the existential vacuum underlying them. This is also true of the crises of pensioners and aging people.”

Existential vacuum can also create other worrying consequences which are detailed in the book. Overall, I find it relevant to discuss these ideas because they are all part of the human experience and it is one to be lived and shared with others.

For me, these three concepts of the logotherapy were very perceptible in the 20th century and they seem to be even more apparent in our post-modern society. Where everything is so fluid and nothing is what is it is, everything can change their meaning in a blink of an eye.

In a way, this new world makes creating roots way harder and, therefore, trusting the meanings you are supposed to fulfill a much more difficult action. Frankl points out that for those who don’t have religious/spiritual beliefs, for instance, it becomes yet harder because they have to find their meaning by themselves.

IMG_0065

It is important to reiterate that the fact that people find it hard sometimes to discover their purposes does not necessarily mean they have a mental condition, but the opposite that they are healthy, and they are human.

The book is much richer than what is portrayed in this brief review and there are some many other concepts I didn’t mention. It is a type of book that each page brings many ideas and ‘a-ha’ moments. I definitely recommend it to every single soul. It’s a 9/10 kind of book. And if you read it let me know your thoughts.

I will write yet another article about other ideas I got/learned/reaffirmed from this book and it was actually the reason I wanted to talk about this book in the first place.

At last, I would like to disclaim that I am not a psychiatrist/psychologist/doctor and I could have interpreted some of the concepts in the wrong way. Also, these articles should not by any means work as a diagnosis. If you need help, seek a professional. Be safe!

[Book review] A Man’s Search for Meaning – Part I

[Book review] A Man’s Search for Meaning – Part I

A Man’s Search for Meaning was one of those books I discovered out of pure luck as I talked about on my Instagram account. I had a written quote from the author, Viktor E. Frankl, in an old notebook of mine and one day I decided to investigate it. Good thing I did.

a man's search for meaning

Turns out Frankl was an Austrian-Jewish neurologist and psychiatrist from the 20th century who was taught by the likes of Sigmund Freud and Alfred Adler. One of his biggest accomplishments career-wise was being the father of the psychotherapy school called logotherapy.

Although less popular than Freud’s psychoanalysis and Adler’s individual psychology, his method was considered one of the most influential forms of existential analysis of his time and is still until today.

In life, though, he achieved a much bigger deed: surviving three holocaust concentration camps. In fact, his study was refined during the years in the camps by observing himself and the other imprisoned men. After the liberation, he returned to the practice of medicine and the treatment of patients and, at last, he writes a piece about all his learnings.

viktor

Young Frankl in 1945

The book is divided in two parts. In the first one Frankl talks about his experiences from the camp in a quite objective way. Well, as objective as he could be all facts considered. The second part was added in the latest editions and is where he explains the concepts involved in the logotherapy analysis process. For me, both parts are captivating for different reasons. The second one, however, brought me some real life insights and has changed my way of thinking and living.

The descriptions of the camp life, in part one of the book, are pretty intense and shocking. Of course, much has already been said, written, filmed and documented about this time in history, but one can’t avoid being impressed by the new perspectives brought by such powerful testimonies.

“Those who have not gone through a similar experience can hardly conceive of the soul-destroying mental conflict and clashes of will power which a famished man experiences.”

Hunger, diseases, poor hygiene and living conditions were not the only issues, when you considerer the dreadful mind games played by the nazi guards which led to mental exhaustion and a constant state of hopelessness.

Despite all horrors inflicted upon, some men found an inner strength to keep surviving. Many of them concentrated their efforts in the hope of being reunited to their loved ones. Others, in the potential life post-camp; some recurred to humor or religion.

Whichever the strategy was, as long as one found a reason, a meaning for that situation one could at least try not giving up. As he quotes Nietzsche on this: “He who has a why to live for can bear with almost any how”.

Frankl then explains how we should find the meaning in everything in life, especially in suffering as it has a great potential to take us to a higher spiritual and mental levels. And that is basically the main argument of logotherapy: the search for meaning.

“The way in which a man accepts his fate and all the suffering it entails, the way in which he takes up his cross, gives him ample opportunity—even under the most difficult circumstances—to add a deeper meaning to his life.”

In this sense, human beings always have a choice to try to learn, grow and find meaning in every situation as we can always choose how to act despite all actions taken around us, for example: an imprisoned man could choose to be selfless and kind in the midst of the horror of the camps.

“Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms—to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.”

And as we have a choice, we also have a responsibility.

“Life ultimately means taking the responsibility to find the right answer to its problems and to fulfill the tasks which it constantly sets for each individual. These tasks, and therefore the meaning of life, differ from man to man, and from moment to moment.”

.

.

.

TO BE CONTINUED